Business Law: Discussion: Holder vs. Holder in Due Course

 

What is the difference between a holder and a holder in due course? Define each and explain the differences.

An example of the holder and holder in due course can happen in a contractual arrangement where the holder is the receiver of payment for an invoice for work accomplished on a contract.  The holder in due course can be a bank that provides a loan to the holder for advance payment for materials and labor. The contract is used as collateral for the loan. 

Your initial post should be at least 300 words with a minimum of two sources cited.

Need an A+ no copied work please

uate

Home

Announcements

Syllabus

Modules

Grades

Course Policies

Writing Center & Library

Course Resources

Week 5 – Final Paper

Final Paper

Select three of the major topics covered throughout the course. Then, analyze the impact these topics can have on the administration of the law enforcement organization. The topics for analysis include:

Boston Police Strike of 1919

Budget considerations by labor and management

Communications and the media

Community opinions and support

Collective bargaining

Ethical considerations for police political involvement

History of police labor unions

Interest-based problem-solving method

Labor relations

Office politics

Pay, benefits, and pension trends

Police labor-management models

Police Unionization

Political endorsements

Politics and police administration

The Final Paper must identify the main issues within the selected areas of reference, depict the new learning that has occurred throughout the course, and relate specific, current, and/or relevant experiences from your past or current workplace and/or organization that demonstrate applicable learning and understanding. The emphasis of the Paper should be the expression of gained knowledge and learning.

The paper must be eight to ten pages in length (excluding the title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least five scholarly resources (at least two from the Ashford Online Library) other than the textbook to support your claims and subclaims. Cite your resources in text and on the reference page. For information regarding APA samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center, within the Learning Resources tab on the left navigation toolbar.

Writing the Final Paper

The Final Paper:

Must be eight to ten double-spaced pages in length, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Must include a title page with the following:

Title of paper

Student’s name

Course name and number

Instructor’s name

Date submitted

Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.

Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.

Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.

Must use at least five scholarly resources, including a minimum of two from the Ashford Online Library.

Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

PRACTICUM REPORT IN LAW

  

I choose 3 different types of court to observe:

1- Supreme Court.

2- Court of Appeals.

3- Marion County Circuit Court.

you will need to write a 7 page paper that compares and contrasts the different courts you observed and summarize your overall learning experience. You can also include comparisons between the US court system and the saudi arabia in court system.

Research paper discusses the difference between the courts in the United States and Saudi Arabia in terms of the judge and how he is appointed and how old and when he is retired and types of courts in the United States and in Saudi Arabia as well as the jury in the US courts and why there is no jury in Saudi Arabia as well as in Saudi Arabia The judge is aware of the case and its details before the hearing other than the judge in the United States does not have case information before the hearing??

– I attached a file containing important information in the search paper.

– 100% NO Plagiarism.

Final Memo Preparation: Part 2

Read the Skywalker fact pattern and the four cases in the Skywalker v. Vader folder.  Answer the following questions:  

1. Does Skywalker have a case against Vader’s estate for the light saber, yes or no?  Come to a preliminary conclusion.

2. Identify which cases you will use to write your memo to support your conclusion.  You must use at least two, but may use more. 

,,,,

check the file for detail 

>>

Law 4

  

What should be the test for determining when prison conditions constitute cruel and unusual punishments?
Is a “deliberate indifference” standard appropriate? In what case does the Court first discuss this standard?
Is it unconstitutional to confine an inmate to a four-by-six foot cell?  
Why or why not?
To double-cell an inmate with a chain smoker?  Why or why not?
To keep cells at 55 degrees? Why or why not?

600 words

Reference in bluebook format

Law 1

  

Explain in detail the Exclusionary Rule. Briefly summarize the holding in Mapp v. Ohio.  Create your own fact pattern to illustrate how the Exclusionary Rule is applied by the Courts.

500 Words

Reference in Bluebook standard

The Case Issue Analysis Project

  

The Case Issue Analysis Project 

HCM3300 Managerial Applications of Health Services Law

Appropriate use of standard English (including spelling, punctuation, and grammar) and APA format must be used.

The case/issue analysis that I have selected is Bragdon v. Abbott

Content:

1. Case/Issue Summary (1-2 pages)
Overview of the history, the background, and the details of the case/Issue

o List of the insufficient details about the case/Issue and the assumptions the student has to make because of the missing information

o Identification of the issue(s) involved

o Stakeholder identification and discussion

o Identify all people/parties involved, including those not specifically mentioned in the case/issue

o List the concerns all stakeholders face or might have

2. Identification and Evaluation of all Main Possible Solutions (2-3 pages)

o List of all main possible solutions. For each resolution under consideration, students should include:

§ List of the significant possible consequences

§ List of the ways the particular solution is likely to positively or negatively affect every stakeholder

§ List of the ethical principles upheld or violated by the solution, including a brief explanation

o Evaluate each main solution and its outcomes, likely impact, and the values upheld and violated by it. Compare the possible solutions to each other and weigh them.

o Are some possible consequences of some possible solutions more important than others? Why?

o Are some possible consequences of some possible solutions more likely to occur than others? Why?

o Does one solution uphold or violate certain values in more or less important ways than another? Why?

o Why is one possible solution better or worse than another?

o If all main solutions are unsatisfactory, has the team searched for other possibilities or variations that have not been considered before?

3. Decision Statement and Defense Against Weaknesses (2-3 pages)

o State which solution is the best and why

o Clarify the details of the chosen resolution and justify it

o Recommend plan of action – exactly how the decision will be carried out

o Defend the decision against objections to its main weaknesses

o State the main weaknesses of the selected decision. Why might someone object the decision?

o What are the best answers to these weaknesses? Explain why the team still considers their decision is the best.

Law 3

  

Does the 6th Amendment, right to a jury trial, mandate that a jury must have 12 members?
Explain the history of the Court’s interpretation of jury size?
In what historical case did the Court state, “a jury comprised of 12 persons, neither more or less.” What was the Court’s reasoning for making this statement?
Explain the Supreme Court’s interpretation of jury size in their 1979 case.

600 Words

Reference in bluebook format

Law 2

  

Explain in detail the Right Against Self-Incrimination found in the 5th Amendment.
Briefly summarize the holding in Miranda v. Arizona.
Create your own fact pattern to illustrate how and when law enforcement agents must give the Miranda warnings.

500 words

Reference in Bluebook standard