Develop a research question in Criminal Justice. Using this, propose the null and research hypothesis. Discuss the sample, and how you would test it. Explain what issues you might have while using a one tailed or two tailed?
check the file for detail
>>
Read the Skywalker fact pattern and the four cases in the Skywalker v. Vader folder. Answer the following questions:
1. Does Skywalker have a case against Vader’s estate for the light saber, yes or no? Come to a preliminary conclusion.
2. Identify which cases you will use to write your memo to support your conclusion. You must use at least two, but may use more.
I choose 3 different types of court to observe:
1- Supreme Court.
2- Court of Appeals.
3- Marion County Circuit Court.
you will need to write a 7 page paper that compares and contrasts the different courts you observed and summarize your overall learning experience. You can also include comparisons between the US court system and the saudi arabia in court system.
Research paper discusses the difference between the courts in the United States and Saudi Arabia in terms of the judge and how he is appointed and how old and when he is retired and types of courts in the United States and in Saudi Arabia as well as the jury in the US courts and why there is no jury in Saudi Arabia as well as in Saudi Arabia The judge is aware of the case and its details before the hearing other than the judge in the United States does not have case information before the hearing??
– I attached a file containing important information in the search paper.
– 100% NO Plagiarism.
What should be the test for determining when prison conditions constitute cruel and unusual punishments?
Is a “deliberate indifference” standard appropriate? In what case does the Court first discuss this standard?
Is it unconstitutional to confine an inmate to a four-by-six foot cell?
Why or why not?
To double-cell an inmate with a chain smoker? Why or why not?
To keep cells at 55 degrees? Why or why not?
600 words
Reference in bluebook format
uate
Home
Announcements
Syllabus
Modules
Grades
Course Policies
Writing Center & Library
Course Resources
Week 5 – Final Paper
Final Paper
Select three of the major topics covered throughout the course. Then, analyze the impact these topics can have on the administration of the law enforcement organization. The topics for analysis include:
Boston Police Strike of 1919
Budget considerations by labor and management
Communications and the media
Community opinions and support
Collective bargaining
Ethical considerations for police political involvement
History of police labor unions
Interest-based problem-solving method
Labor relations
Office politics
Pay, benefits, and pension trends
Police labor-management models
Police Unionization
Political endorsements
Politics and police administration
The Final Paper must identify the main issues within the selected areas of reference, depict the new learning that has occurred throughout the course, and relate specific, current, and/or relevant experiences from your past or current workplace and/or organization that demonstrate applicable learning and understanding. The emphasis of the Paper should be the expression of gained knowledge and learning.
The paper must be eight to ten pages in length (excluding the title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least five scholarly resources (at least two from the Ashford Online Library) other than the textbook to support your claims and subclaims. Cite your resources in text and on the reference page. For information regarding APA samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center, within the Learning Resources tab on the left navigation toolbar.
Writing the Final Paper
The Final Paper:
Must be eight to ten double-spaced pages in length, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a title page with the following:
Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted
Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
Must use at least five scholarly resources, including a minimum of two from the Ashford Online Library.
Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Your company, AB Investigative Services (ABIS) has been contacted by a prominent state law enforcement agency concerning the need to discuss, in a high-level meeting, specific computer-related forensics tools and their functions when governing the seizures of computers and other technology. On behalf of your ABIS, you will conduct a training meeting for 25 state law enforcement agency forensic investigative personnel.
In your training meeting, you must provide specific details of what forensic tools are available for use, and what current evidence processing laws are in place.
For full credit, your 3–4-paragraph Discussion Board posting must include the following information:
Explain in detail the Right Against Self-Incrimination found in the 5th Amendment.
Briefly summarize the holding in Miranda v. Arizona.
Create your own fact pattern to illustrate how and when law enforcement agents must give the Miranda warnings.
500 words
Reference in Bluebook standard
Does the 6th Amendment, right to a jury trial, mandate that a jury must have 12 members?
Explain the history of the Court’s interpretation of jury size?
In what historical case did the Court state, “a jury comprised of 12 persons, neither more or less.” What was the Court’s reasoning for making this statement?
Explain the Supreme Court’s interpretation of jury size in their 1979 case.
600 Words
Reference in bluebook format
The Case Issue Analysis Project
HCM3300 Managerial Applications of Health Services Law
Appropriate use of standard English (including spelling, punctuation, and grammar) and APA format must be used.
The case/issue analysis that I have selected is Bragdon v. Abbott
Content:
1. Case/Issue Summary (1-2 pages)
Overview of the history, the background, and the details of the case/Issue
o List of the insufficient details about the case/Issue and the assumptions the student has to make because of the missing information
o Identification of the issue(s) involved
o Stakeholder identification and discussion
o Identify all people/parties involved, including those not specifically mentioned in the case/issue
o List the concerns all stakeholders face or might have
2. Identification and Evaluation of all Main Possible Solutions (2-3 pages)
o List of all main possible solutions. For each resolution under consideration, students should include:
§ List of the significant possible consequences
§ List of the ways the particular solution is likely to positively or negatively affect every stakeholder
§ List of the ethical principles upheld or violated by the solution, including a brief explanation
o Evaluate each main solution and its outcomes, likely impact, and the values upheld and violated by it. Compare the possible solutions to each other and weigh them.
o Are some possible consequences of some possible solutions more important than others? Why?
o Are some possible consequences of some possible solutions more likely to occur than others? Why?
o Does one solution uphold or violate certain values in more or less important ways than another? Why?
o Why is one possible solution better or worse than another?
o If all main solutions are unsatisfactory, has the team searched for other possibilities or variations that have not been considered before?
3. Decision Statement and Defense Against Weaknesses (2-3 pages)
o State which solution is the best and why
o Clarify the details of the chosen resolution and justify it
o Recommend plan of action – exactly how the decision will be carried out
o Defend the decision against objections to its main weaknesses
o State the main weaknesses of the selected decision. Why might someone object the decision?
o What are the best answers to these weaknesses? Explain why the team still considers their decision is the best.
Dissertationlance.com provides students with professional writing and editing assistance. We help them cope with academic assignments such as essays, articles, term and research papers, theses, dissertations, coursework, case studies, PowerPoint presentations, book reviews, etc.
All delivered papers are samples meant to be used only for research purposes.